Overview: Surveillance Uncovers Inconsistencies in Personal Injury Lawsuit

In May 2024, Privin Network was retained by a national law firm to conduct discreet surveillance on a subject involved in a personal injury lawsuit in Fort Collins, Colorado. The individual claimed physical limitations as part of the ongoing legal proceedings. Our assignment: verify whether the subject’s day-to-day activity aligned with their reported injuries.

With a holiday weekend approaching and favorable conditions for outdoor activity, our surveillance team deployed in the Fort Collins area, monitoring the subject across two consecutive days.

Surveillance Strategy and Setup

Our approach involved static surveillance from multiple mobile vantage points with zoom-capable equipment. Investigators conducted pre-surveillance scouting to determine likely egress routes and areas of activity, anticipating the subject’s potential movement over the Memorial Day weekend.

On Day One, surveillance was active from morning until evening, yielding over 47 minutes of video footage. The second day yielded no observable activity other than spending time with their pets, but provided valuable confirmation of behavior patterns.

img

Key Findings: Physical Activity That Contradicts Injury Claims

Over the course of the first day, our team documented the subject engaging in moderate to high-level physical exertion inconsistent with their claimed injuries. Observations included:

  • Walking and jogging without visible discomfort
  • Navigating curbs and stairs without hesitation
  • Riding on a motorcycle
  • Attending a local event with no assistive devices or support

These activities were captured with timestamped video and included various angles and distances to ensure clarity and admissibility.

On the second day, investigators conducted continued surveillance to establish patterns but the subject did not leave the residence. However, the subject was spotted outside the residence with their pets.

img

Privin Network delivered a comprehensive surveillance report including:

  • 47 minutes of edited and raw video footage
  • A photographic evidence index
  • Investigator logs and location validation

The client law firm was provided with court-admissible documentation to be used in the ongoing case. The surveillance findings introduced material inconsistencies between the subject’s claimed limitations and their observed behavior, potentially affecting the trajectory of the personal injury lawsuit.

Suspect the claim doesn’t match the behavior? Privin Network delivers answers with video, precision, and clarity.

Colorado Injury Surveillance Investigations That Hold Up in Court

Personal injury cases demand evidence that can withstand legal scrutiny. Privin Network specializes in discreet, professional surveillance that reveals the truth behind the claims.

Need proof? We bring the evidence to light.

Frequently Asked Questions About Injury Claim Surveillance in Colorado

Is it legal to conduct surveillance on someone involved in a personal injury claim?

Yes. Our investigations follow all applicable Colorado privacy and surveillance laws. Footage is captured from public vantage points and documented legally.

Can this type of evidence be used in court?

Absolutely. Our reports include timestamped footage, investigator logs, and verification details formatted specifically for legal review.

What if the subject doesn’t leave their home?

Even a lack of activity can be important. We document all surveillance efforts including dates, times, and lack of movement, which may support or contradict claimed limitations.

How much footage do you typically capture in a case like this?

It varies. In this case, we captured over 47 minutes of footage across one day. Duration depends on the subject’s behavior and schedule.

Do you only operate in Fort Collins?

No. Privin Network serves clients across the entire state of Colorado and internationally. Fort Collins was the region for this particular case.